Behind the prevailing paradigm which from experience I believe can be named the 'statistical, archetypal world', is another world. It is trying to establish contact with someone, everyone, anyone

In 1984 I was fully waked up into that  pattern driven world, having lived 5 decades in a different world, that I can only describe as having no opposites. I remember that I could not think of anything 'opposite', when I was much younger and in my nearly 'thought-less' mind wondered to myself, why I could not think of anything 'opposite'. This state of mind changed early in 1983 when another 'strand of thought' began to emerge in occasional episodes when a particular kind of 'double context' emerged beneath ordinary words that people used; these were particular people in my life. The first episodes were confusing and frightening because of the effect on my body,
I  literally felt dizzy and at times could barely remain erect. The world that I lived in had a barrier that was visible to me odd as that may seem, because I believed people looked at me 'funny'. I grew up in a small town and knew relatively few people outside of my immediate family.

                                                                    The Double Bind

I realize now that I had not learned  the social skills that encourage relationships and develop friends.  I knew nothing about several ordinary seeming habits that would have prevented that barrier from isolating me. 

One of the most remarkable 'co-incidences' that I can recognize now, almost 20 years after the first 'shocking' event happened, was realizing that the person who created the 'shock' had exactly the same situation in his life as I had in my life, at that time.  My fascination with a certain couple began when I  noticed a remark people made about the man, 'He has no personality." I wondered why so many people made that casual remark,  not to the man, but behind his back so to speak. It was the beginning of a 15 years of fascination, and focused attention on that one man,  from 1974 to 1989. By then I  realized my attention had been focused on this couple because their relationship was a mirror of my own life, at the time.

 Some intelligence other than my own was holding up a mirror to display an aspect of my life! The man was a square dance caller and I'd had a vivid dream that initiated a stream of thought about the dream that didn't stop.Neither of us had learned much about the necessity to be 'polite', to measure one's words so that one doesn't offend or discourage .  In this particular situation this person was constantly offending and discouraging the people who could  have helped him achieve his hearts desire. What I saw was maddeningly strange for several years.  I became aware  rather slowly, that everyone in this scene believed he was harsh, verbally cruel and deliberately demeaning.  One day something happened that caused me to wonder to myself, how a kind and gentle person like him could do what I had just seen him do: be  cruel to a small dog while a number of people watched him. The sense that it was not 'normal' for this person to be harsh and cold, began to 'dawn' on me and along with a need to explain to myself why people who knew him remarked quite frequently that he had no personality. He was quite good, even remarkably good at devising flowing but difficult square dances.

There is nothing I can write about in the depth that it's necessary to do, that can explain how actual experience in my life  created a kind of conversation that used  events, memories and situations that were unique to me, the life that I had lived and was at the time living in the real world.  Something new was actually beginning to be taught to the mainstream square dancers in our area. I was not alone in what happened. We were engaged in an activity that was specific and new to the square dancers in our area and these people  seemed to know what I was thinking at times, which startled me very much for a few years. I heard people speak and act as though they were connected to and were speaking to my unspokenthought!

This event was years long and it happened to a fairly large number of couples, individuals and in their actual life situations.

Living in that world  in which I had an enormous blind spot until I was nearing my 5th decade, I was completely  unawares of the 'pattern' driven statistical, archetypal world' i.e the Aristotlean 'world of forms' , logic, or how prevailing it is.  It was like being born at an age where I had acquired language and experiences of a particular content, and in a specific particular context that were necessary to recognize the prevailing world, the world that males have experienced  when it began to talk to me. It was a  voice but not like a human voice.

 It is a form that has become virtually invisible because it has become ever-present to the majority of educated males and females. There is nothing more difficult  to see than  something that is right in front of you, in which  you are embedded. Like a raindrop in a river that retains its memory, and its only recently (2017) that water does have memory of its prior states!

It began without any warning in the early 1980's with a strange change of hearing and  a new perception began to emerge.  I experienced this change in my body immediately and recognize a shared mind with  my husband had created a new mind in us, it was  a real role reversal.

John Gribbon wrote in his book, The Double Helix, that with the discovery of the cell, biology had found its correspondent to the atom. Therefore it makes sense to understand that the body carries a kind of information that generates thought, impulses as well as activities and  passivities that are experienced with some degree  of feelings, pleasure or discomfort. My body was changed and my mind changed radically. It was a reversal of the content of my habits and there is a simple explanation for what happened in chemistries between individuals, and probably groups. I had neurological tests done that resulted in finding that my handedness had reversed.

A peculiar kind of inertia, and heaviness made it difficult to do many of my 'normal' activities, I felt sluggish yet I felt a continuous 'tremor-like' sensation that I couldn't describe that  wouldn't let me rest or sit still and concentrate.   I suspect now that  energy was re-directed towards certain 'new activities', at least they were new to me. I remember trying to describe how I felt, 'shimmery, trembly' but those words didn't seem to make sense to the psychiatrist I had begun to see.

However a shift in the content of several of my normal habits was distinctly  noticeable to me so that  I recognized a particular kind of 'role reversal' had taken place between my husband and myself, in  our marital bond. Without awareness a fixed pattern of  'shared activities and passivities had replaced whatever had been individual in me before we married.  A confusing kind of doubleness of context began to occur between us, but I realized fairly quickly that it had always been there in his mind.  A part of the change turned offhand remarks into important comments that seemed to relate to unspoken thought in my mind, and this was very nearly overwhelmingly confusing. Offhand remarks that were utterly absurd and out of context had been said to me but I simply had not been able to 'hear/see'  them although I remembered them. They were embedded in every day conversations until a special sense began to highlight what was relevant to our real life situations at the time, although I didn't know it was a special sense until about 1988 and I'd had 3 mindquakes by then.

I felt and experienced what it feels like to become 'bottled up', I felt 'restrained, contained' in my body which was a radical change, quite painful.

However, the effect produced a particular 'tunnel vision' focused on minute details, which to me at least, had been invisible! When I noticed myself glancing at automobile license tabs, seeing the numbers and letters that ordinarily I would never have paid attention towards, I also noticed my mind trying to make something sensible out of them. It was an utterly useless endeavor that did not seem to be mine; it was a change that  I barely noticed at first. Trying to 'make sense' out of senseless endeavors was an important attribute of the change itself. However eventually I realized that some extremely curious toddlers must also experience the same patterns that I noticed  in myself. I tried to understand what was working in my mind and thought, as I 'discovered' them,  attribute by attribute.

 By July 31, 1984 the change had altered every aspect of my life and my body. Thought' of a distinctly different kind which had emerged quite gradually, became pervasive, overlaying every part of my life. I had been 'empty headed' until the early 1980's, then I became 'thought full', really full of non-stop thinking, of a distinctly unique content at first. The 'stream of thought' was an object to me, that I 'looked at/listened to' without awareness, but with plenty of curiosity after it was initiated. It was a few years after 1984 that I realized an inner change was altering everything outside of my body but this had been 'normal' to the  'man'. A distinct kind of 'doubleness' emerged, timed precisely to create a second string of context from what I normally understood. I noticed that jokes often create that kind of double context when I began to experience old age and laughed at jokes that had never been funny.

A 'shift' of attention occurred sporadically at first in the early 1980's. It caused me to hear differently as though for some reason the 'volume' was enhanced on certain specific content  that  ordinarily I wouldn't have noticed. This alteration in my every day life was extremely uncomfortable to my body, I believe now, because I was seeing or hearing something completely new to me. For a few years I experienced a state of 'no compute' because there was nothing in my past by which any understanding or context would be generated. I became aware that 'understanding' is ALWAYS created from my past, but after 1984 I began to become aware that in 'history' there is another reservoir of experience that is not mine, it is history itself. This huge reservoir of 'experience', which Emanuel Swedenborg described as an 'internal memory' much vaster than the natural memory of 'man' was unknown to me, completely unsuspected to exist by me. 

The 'initiation' into the Larger Domain, as I named it after 1989, began under the guise of natural world causes. Within a few years it was obvious to  me that the natural world is a world of objects that we can see, but the Larger Domain is really what directs the attention of we two legged uprights on this planet. The search for extra terrestrial intelligence ought to begin 'within', because the 'kingdom of heaven' is within. 

I believe it was initiated under the guise of a couple of real world causes, (learning advanced and challenge levels of square dancing and the 1984 Olympic games). But  it's real cause was in regard to what I experienced in the 11 days that the Los Angeles Olympic Games were being played in 1984 to a very confused individual: me. An enormous package of information about my life occurred while I tried to make a circular skirt from a warm brown, one way mirror image remnant of wool fabric. It was almost a year later that I heard myself say aloud as I walked to my car after my shift at Boeing: "It was a message. I got a message."  I had recently read Carl Sagans' fictional book, Contact. The books plot is an outline of what I  went through, finding one level had to be understood before the next level emerged  as I lived my every day life.

The experience, overall created a conversation using a kind of 'voice' created methodically and mechanically, in a form that I believe is experienced by many who do not realize how their 'thought' is generated, or how their 'ideas' emerge. A completely new idea emerged to me, in a chaotic form based on something I'd read in a couple of books that influenced me, each in a different way: The Bridge Of San Luis Rey which is about one man's attempt to prove the existence of God; and Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke. Odd to say, some imprints of the book carry a statement from him: "The contents of this  book do not express the opinions of the author." Apparently Joseph Chilton Pearce and I were not the only individuals who experienced this book as a kind of powerful lived experience, during reading it. 

The 'thing itself',  described itself but in a nearly unbelievable way and formed the answer to a clew that there is a 'secret about it just out of sight, around the corner' . The word 'it'' refers to insanity. That sentence was originally embedded within The Bridge Of San Luis Rey in a chapter titled: Perhaps and Intention! The remark made by an abbess who was talking to a visitor from Span,  had to be brought to my attention and I watched the process of 'abstraction' that drew it out of embeddedness. It is an indisputable fact that this clew is contained in a chapter titled, Perhaps an Intention although Thornton Wilder may not have grasped that the title of the chapter was 'given' to him by an intention  other than his own, operating through him,  long before George Orwell's book, 1984 was conceived! 

.I hope I can describe enough of how that happened to be credible, because it seems incredible, but it did explain its Self, to me. It told me my name, and it identified to me, and it   obviously knew where I was physically on Earth several times!