"In her mind she thought she could hear one joyous shout amidst a clamor of other voices."   

Embedded in a book,  Contact  by Carl Sagan, this thought about 'one joyous shout' embedded in a 'clamor of other voices' in a mind was suddenly a fact about my own mind and my life, true just then, when I re-read it one day. That happened a few years after I'd first read the book in 1985.   Ellen Arroway, a character in a fictional book,  Contact authored by the famous skeptic  Carl Sagan,  has just received confirmation that the signal that has been picked up is not 'local'. It's the first contact with extra terrestrials. They discovered a signal  that  used prime numbers which implies some intelligence has sent them. But later someone recognized another level that has to be decoded. When that embedded second level is decoded its a single image that implies television signals have been picked up and this one image is returned.  There are other levels in the signal, each is embedded and has to be discovered. The signal is a palimpsest. I'd never read the word 'palimpsest' until I read this book. The entire book was about the search for extra terrestrials but there were several mentions about pi that were not in the movie.

 I'd not noticed them when I first read Contact.

By 1989 when the book fell onto the floor one day, open and creased to a certain page I noticed a sentence about pi when I smoothed the crease with my finger, that was a real  coincidence, a detail about my life!   "Carl Sagan told me that pi is coded!" I thought, laughing at a real cosmic level joke that is literally true, to me.   I'd had a mind quake when I looked at an arrangement of  pi's decimals in a different book, The History of Pi by Petr Beckmann. In a glance I'd had the 'pi quake' that revealed a hidden vein of activity carried forwards in my  life and it had begun when I was very young. No other person would have had that happen, after only a glance at the first of two pages of pi decimals.

In 1989 I'd had a pi quake not realizing I'd read that pi is coded in Sagans' book.

I had learned a lot when that book fell open to just that page. I understood by then that  I'd had a mindquake in 1984 and had become aware it was a palimpsest because it had so many levels and had occurred in a remote  location in my own mind. Perhaps it was information that was born in my body but it had to be discovered bit of information by bit of information.

In 1985 I went to work at Boeing where a pi model was used as their Pride In Excellence  awards program logo.

I need to describe a mind quake at this point. A mind quake is an enormous bundle of a batched retrieval of memories from my own past, assembled in a movie like linearity that told me about my own life.This was a psychologically viewed interpretation of certain events that had been abstracted from my real life. That's a lot of information to keep in mind. I'd had several by 1990. The first one in 1984  occurred  in a fraction of a second as best I can explain it and I had to discover it later, Reading words in books such as Contact seems to me to have made it possible to discover it!  Words in books sometimes shocked me, at other times they felt familiar as though I knew them already, which may imply the body is information or produces it when situations, certain specific situations happen.

 The long strings of retrieved memories were specific, yet somehow each event was visible at the time.

 In 1984 I had neurological tests done that were interpreted to a very surprised me. They  proved that my handedness had reversed. My left hand was dominate now, my right hand was slow, clumsy and to my surprise I could write with my left hand, backwards as well as I'd written with my right had forwards!!! It was about 1982 that I noticed I had begun to hear and see differently but by that time, my body felt uncomfortable, very different than normal for me. By 1984 I knew something was wrong.  I'd been seeing a psychiatrist at Harborview Hospital, Dr. Robert Waters who ordered the tests. When he told me the results, I could see that a very great change had slipped into my mind, but also in my personal life, and it had happened over a span of a few years, slowly. The effects of what I'd assumed was a blow on my head  seemed to be the cause that changed not just the content in my mind but also my relationships with certain significant people who were not family members. They were just people that  I knew at that  point in Time  but this was a kind of relationship to my own body and mind was new to me. I was noticing things that I could have noticed many times in the past about some people we associated with frequently. I noticed  I had an increasing curiosity about specific people in their marital relationship, these were  couples I knew casually  except in one case.  But I  could see that my 'thought' was different, my mind was different and I felt very unlike my normal self. I was curious about that 'new to me' thought also. Being told that my handedness had reversed explained nothing then.

 The purpose of this page is to illustrate something I experienced in a flash of time in 1989 as best I can date it, I named it my 'pi' quake, and it was the fourth such event. I believed the first one had happened in the 10 days between July 31 and August 11, 1984 while the Los Angeles Olympic Games were played until after the second one happened in 1989. That one revealed that the first one, much smaller, had happened one night in 1982 while I waited for a square dance class to begin. It was a critical event, I remembered it and what it contained but I could not have understood it because so much had to happen, that had not yet happened. It revealed a pattern at work in Time itself, that many individuals experience in some form.

As time passed and events happened everything merged as though designed long ago to happen just so.

Some information to begin with:

I was born 1-2-32. On 2-11-85 I drove through the security gates of the Boeing Fabrication division in Auburn, Washington for the first time. There was a 9 ft tall model of the pi symbol in the plaza that I was surprised to see.  My red Datsun 210 had a license tab: ETW 651 and I reluctantly joined a union: IAM 751. All of these details were just numbers, there was nothing significant, they were not linked in my mind, in any way. ETW 651 had a unique history because at first glance ETW transformed into Extra Terrestrial Woman. That had happened automatically in my thought. I noticed it and thought it was 'funny'.  Extra Terrestrial Woman 651 was amusing but meant nothing at that point. Later however, other incidents happened that caused me to feel like a satellite. I had a sense of being maneuvered, controlled from afar.  Later I saw a computer generated portrait of myself, using x and o's that I'd gotten in 1983 or thereabouts.  It was just an image until later, a few years had  passed when I happened to look at it again. Then an association formed in my thought,  that  it looked like how I'd felt. I had felt like a machine when the picture was constructed. Every picture I took during a two years period (1981-1983) was hazy, out of focus and I noticed this in the same way, later. What could have caused my 'camera' to photograph how I felt, hazy, out of focus? I wondered at such a relationship, how could the same thing happen over such a span of Time?

The first block of decimals from Petr Beckmann's History of Pi, is a rectangle that contains the first  10 decimals of the first 10 hundreds... This is the only arrangement that  brings certain numbers into neighborhood. Further down on this page I've given several different arrangements to verify that the numbers in this rectangle 'meet' only in this arrangement. The reason that's important is not easy to describe to anyone else but this page is an attempt to explain my 'pi' quake in 1989.  Below is the first block, notice in the first line 1,1,2,3,5,8 the  first Fibonacci numbers. And the number 265 which I'd

just read in the copyright statement and wondered about but there's more. Much more.

 

3.                                       3.

1415926535 8…               1x 1x  x2 x 35  8...     

8214808651                

4428810975

7245870066               

3305727036               

9833673362

0005681271               

4201995611

5024459455                                                       

5982534904   

...  

 This block is on the page that  I was looking at when  I had my 'pi' quake in 1989.  What is a 'pi' quake?  It's an enormous batch of information shaped around what I was looking at specifically at the moment. But it was formed by  using memories from my past that were retrieved and presented like a 'movie' in a fraction of a second. This event was an unexpected, literally stunning revelation of a hidden thread of activity in my life that  I could realize immediately had begun with my first memory on this planet.  It was possible because I had learned by then, to recognize a presentation of a 'moebius twist mirroring' pattern  that I would not have recognized my self, in the first 11 numbers, 31415926535.  (The Fibonacci numbers, 1,1,2,3,5,8 are in the first 10 decimals)  Seeing and understanding the 'moebius twist pattern' in those  first 10 numbers  was the result of a 'program' that had begun when I was about 9 years old. That's when an impulse that was not connected to anything I'd read or learned from someone else, caused me to do some trivial seeming action. I learned from the impulse which was at that point just  a thought in my head: "..add the double numbers (the products)  in each of the times tables." There's a hidden repeating pattern in each times tables, and I thought it quite interesting.

 

That impulse has caused me to see something or do something that no person ever was involved in.

 

The first 10 numbers are coded in several ways that just flipped in a rapid sequence into my mind using a. pattern that was familiar to me and particular to my past. That first 'display' was followed by other relationships that no other person but me would ever notice or understand. I could not have any doubt after it that I was not imagining the meanings of what I had named 'second underlying contexts', a new kind of inner event that had begun to emerge in my mind in the two years prior to 1984. It was not easy to notice this 'inner event' because it happened so rapidly, that it took two years to be somewhat certain it was happening. Two events happened that caused me to understand what was happening. A rapid 'replay' of my thought occurred, 'batched' with no space between words. The 'replay' seemed to turn the thought around and 'speak' to me as a person would speak. This is important to keep in mind, it was new to me and it altered everything for more than a few years between 1984 and 1989, and even afterwards. Literally it is 'second sight'! It caused a kind of 'twinning' effect that caused lights at night to seem paired like eyes, somehow frightening. But that was also not easy to recognize until a few years of experience had made this 'effect' somewhat distinct.

'

After 1984 whatever was 'in'  my head was as visible to me as any object outside of my body is visible, but the ability to relate to what I saw in my mind when it happened, did not exist until several years later. It's not easy to explain how an event has visibility in the mind, but  that it cannot be related to when it occurs, that can happen later, eventually, but not 'now'. It has to be discovered as though it were in a different galaxy. A connection develops very, very slowly automatically, if anyone experiences anything similar to what I've experienced. It is not in a location where it can be spoken even then, although automatic writing is somehow available before the content can be recognized as a package!

 

By 1989,  I had  become aware that the kind of event that I had named with my own term 'second underlying contexts'  was what C. G. Jung had named 'meaningful coincidence.   But prior to knowing anything about Jung's ideas I had become aware that Emanuel Swedenborg's writing had other names for the same kind of 'event'. It became obvious that whatever it was that Swedenborg and Jung had written about, it was embedded in Time as a pattern. It seems likely that in different times there were other words for the same kind of 'event'. I believe the word 'illustrations' in the Bible is about this kind of interpretation

 

This was actually the third major 'mindquake' I've had, because now I realize I've had several that I didn't recognize until years had passed.  An important one happened in 1982, it was the first 'inner event' in which events from my past were 'retrieved' that had a symbolic relationship, actually describing to me what was happening at the time, in my real life!!! This relationship was not easy to notice and then have some faith in as a way to identify me, and in a real way 'speak' at me, by describing TO me, what was happening in my life!!!  Its an obscure process that conveys or tries to convey: "I can see you, I know you, and can tell you what you are looking at, what you are doing."  When my daughter and I stepped off a bus in downtown Paris I was filled with an understanding of the labor and suffering that built this city but it was in a form that was not as confusing or painful as it was in the beginning.

 

 If you have seen the movie, Mercury Rising there's a scene where an autistic boy looks at a page in his new puzzle book. While he looks the numbers, symbols and letters on the page seem to shift about, then he goes to the phone, dials a number and says: "You are a stranger." This is a phone call nobody was supposed to ever make, but in a glance  a code that was supposed to be unbreakable has been broken. (About a year ago I looked for a definition  and the origin of my name, Eldridge. The first link I clicked onto said that Eldritch was the original form of my name and it meant: 'strange'. "You are a stranger." had a special significance to me although it was later that I recognized this was an event that 'named' me specifically.)  This kind of 'coincidence' is quite specific in that attribute. 

 

88888

 

Unsuspecting, I looked in the index of The History Of Pi by Petr Beckmann for a reference then noticed two pages of decimals at the back of the book. At least 13 incidents had happened in the 6 months prior to that day, that caused me to be able to relate to what the 'shifting and rearrangements of the digits' in this rectangle revealed. They were just ordinary events until this day revealed their hidden significance. In addition to those incidents I had lived for 6 decades and had certain experiences relating to what I saw, so I was made aware of a connection through events I had not suspected were a 'hidden vein' of events, aimed towards the future.

 

3.

1415926535 8…     

8214808651                

4428810975

724587006              

3305727036               

9833673362

0005681271               

4201995611

5024459455                                                       

5982534904    ...    

 

 I read the book for no other reason than that the pi symbol was the Boeing company logo for their awards program, Pride In Excellence. The only 'angle' was that literally pi sounds like the initials, PIE. I had belonged to two small square dance clubs for about 9 years by the time 1984 scrolled through Time, and without awareness I had learned about a concept that governs not only squaredancing but the I Ching, chess, checkers, ideas about quantum physics, and last but certainly not least, the idea of 'projection' in psychiatry. Projection is defined in an unusual form as 'self observation' twisted around; some inner material is experienced as though it is outside,  as in the myth of Narcissus and Echo and perhaps in the story of Eve who  heard a snake talk. In The Field of Dreams, it's a cornfield that 'talks'.  Much has to be written about this mechanism, which creates what I named 'second underlying contexts' because new contexts are generated, irregardless of the former use of words, events and circumstances.  There is a 'twist' involved that creates 'self reference'. The square dance set involves the interaction of opposites, in a particular kind of mirroring which I believed I'd discovered and named the 'moebius twist'.

 The kind of 'mirroring' that I learned about in a very private form,  was  from noticing new 'thought' and being gripped by, governed by a distinctly new kind of 'attention' and curiosity about a strange 'difference' that did not actually alter any real thing. I began to grasp that the change was in my own mind, but there were individuals in my life then who gave every evidence of knowing what was developing, evolving in my 'thought'. This requires a lot of explanation, and I want to confine this to describing the 'pi quake'.

In the back of Petr Beckmann's History of Pi are two pages of pi's decimals. "The first 10,000 of 100,265 calculated in 1962..." reads the copyright acknowledgement which I read before looking at the first page. At first glance I noticed that the first line contained the number 265, which I'd just read and thought  about because it seemed an 'odd' number. Why not an 'even' 100,000 or 100,200, or 100,250? My thought in that moment of reflection was connected to and derived from memories in the past to some specific memories and experiences in my past that at that point were not related to pi. Then I turned back to the first page of decimals.

 

The first glance settled on the numbers I'd just been 'reflecting about', 265 in the first line of decimals. Then a kind of 'shuffling' occurred.

 In a flash of time the decimals in this arrangement generated an almost magical flow of 'data' that I had no problem remembering afterwards. That in itself is quite remarkable that I remembered so much. I saw the Fibonacci numbers, 1,1,2,3,5,8 in the first 10 decimals. I'd just read about them in the book. They formed a pattern by which a kind of transformation occurred instantly, but in a form I had learned about in a very private way that  I had named the 'moebius twist' concept. 3. 14 15 92 65 3  followed by this new one:   3.  5  6  2  653  This had happened according to a 'rule' that I recognized. The numbers separated by the Fibonacci numbers were 'cross summed' on the left side of the center 2, but not on the right side and immediately I saw that now the numbers mirror from the center out: 356 2 653 The rule involved a 'moebius twist' in that  the numbers 9 + 2 11, and 1 + 1 = 2, which implied more than one 'use' of the 92.

The moebius twist is a mirror image concept;  a concept I had to discover, bit by bi. Then I named it believing I had discovered it! I'd learned of it while I struggled to learn challenge level square dancing when I had to learn to dance with 'phantom dancers' as though they were real people. Then the 'instruction' had come very slowly when I was forced to try to 'visualize' in my head where I was, and where the 'phantom dancers' were as they moved about. They had to be 'acted with' as though they were actually there and with every step every dancers location changed! ! Phantoms added to the set was what initiated having to learn to visualize in my  head, an almost indescribably difficult new place to try at age 55+ to enter.

There was also another worrisome fact:  I puzzled over why people used the term 'mirror image' to describe the relationship of one half of the set to the other half. It  was obviously not the normal kind of 'mirror image' where I would see my counterpart directly in front of me. She was beside the person in front of me! I found myself doing something odd one day:   If you take a transparent strip and draw one half of a square dance formation facing the end of it, on the end of it, and do the same on the opposite end, then join the ends, this is a typical mirroring but it's not the relationships in the square dance set. But if the band is twisted one half turn, then joined the result is a legitimate picture of any square dance formation.    I was astonished that day to realize that I had not understood the concept of a 'binary unit', that is where 2 = 1, or each couple is a unit, one a left hand, the other a right hand. They actually dance separately but the caller has to match each person to their original dancer by the end of the tip. There are 4 binary units in a set, but 8 individuals form one unit ( 8 = 1) who must do the right thing (whatever the caller chants) as though they were 1 or the dance collapses into embarrassing chaos.

The word 'concept' had come to mean something specific to me by then:  a rule was added to a simple mainstream movement and it was suddenly difficult to do. One such 'concept' call creates imaginary people in the set who have to be tracked and danced with as they move through the sequence. I could not move when the caller chanted: "In your phantom set up...." At that point every dancer must be aware of the formation, of their position in the formation and their position  in the  genderless couple and the empty spots where the phantoms are at that moment. The next steps alter everything so this 'scanning' has to be repeated almost immediately. There are no males or female roles at that level.  Having to learn to dance 'belle' and 'beaux' positions makes squaredancing very difficult to do, but concept calls extend the difficulty into a 'whole other level'! There was another 'concept' call that taught me something unrelated to square dancing: "once removed".  AT some point I began to realize I was somehow added to what was in front of me in a peculiar 'bodiless' way, so I was experiencing everything from  a 'once removed' viewing point. This requires more explanation but the effect was of being both audience and actor in a drama. This 'effect' changed later.  888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

I did not look for anything, these relationships exploded in a flash of time, but I remembered afterwards much of what was 'shown' to me.

 

After seeing '265' in the first line, I noticed 1,1,2,3,5,8 which I'd just read about in the book, these were the Fibonacci sequence.....

Then the first 6 decimals:   14 15  92 formed into 5,6,2. and in a flash I saw 56 2 65, a mirror reversal of the numbers.

Then I saw 3.56 2 653 when the whole number 3 was brought into relationship. The following may help understand:

 

3.

1415926535  8…     1. The first 6 Fibonacci numbers are in the

8214808651                 first 11 decimals. 1x1xx2xx35  8…

4428810975

7245870066                The numbers can be paired according to

3305727036                this form: 14 15 92 65 35 8 (92 is a twisted pair)

9833673362

0005681271                This means the numbers have a double use

4201995611                on the first level of coding. 9+2 = 11   

5024459455                                                                                     1 = 1 =  2

5982534904

 

3.                                                                   

     14    15    xx  65  3x         =         x5  x6    xx  65  3x         (3 = 1, counting by 3's) I see  651 in all directions, up and down, 

      82  14    xx  x6  51         =       x1  x5    xx  x6  51         cross summed on the left side, literal on the right side. this is a pattern

      x4  2x    xx  xx  75          =       xx  6x    xx  xx  75          that repeated later in a different 'pi' event! It was even more amazing in a way.

      xx  xx    xx  xx   x6          =       xx   xx    xx  xx  x6         I had a car that was licensed ETW 651, and had many experiences with 651.

      xx  xx   xx   xx  xx 

      xx  xx   xx   xx  xx

      xx  xx   xx  xx   xx  

I repeat myself but keep in mind that when I read the copyright statement on the last page. “100,265 decimals calculated in July 1961…”  I  noticed a different observer within me, that wondered about ‘265’, that it seemed an ‘odd’ number, why was it not rounded off to, 100,000 or 100,250. I 'looked at', this that seemed to do something 'odd'. This kind of ‘wondering’ has occurred a few times in the past. I believe I do not ‘generate it’, I watch it, listen to it, it seems to be me ‘wondering’, it seems to be thought of mine, self generated but I believe now this is the Other, the ‘kingdom’; Jung named it the ‘transcendental function’s operation’, the Self.

 

In the few weeks prior I’d had three  unusual experiences relating to ‘265’, so they were still fresh in my mind.

 

The first line contains xxxxx265xx which I had ‘wondered about’ as being an ‘odd choice’. Then the 'slide show' began:

 

At a glance the first 6 Fibonacci numbers sprang into prominence:

 1  1  2  35  8       (I had just read about them in The History Of Pi. My dad's birth date 52311 emerged, reversed

                              with the  32 a twisted pair. I did not look for this.)  

 

A pairing in the first 10 decimals  occurred, using a pattern of addition I’d learned from an impulse, when I was 9 years old: ‘add the

 double numbers across’  14 = 5      15 = 6     9+2 = 11 = 2      6+5 = 11 = 1 . There were three layers to this one:

 

 3. 14 15 92 65 35 8       = 3.  X5  X 6   11 11  8     8   

                                                x 1  1 x   2  2  8   8     (5 + 6 = 11)   (1 + 1 = 2)  (1 + 1 + 2) 8    8 =

 

                                          3.        2          2   2   8    8

                                          3                               8    8   = 11 = 2 =

 

                                          2        2          2   2  =     8    = 23                                                                        
 

"Adding the numbers"  in the product was taught to me at age 9 by a 'thought', an  impulse, not from reading a book. There are several different names for the same process that I became aware of  privately when I was about 9 years old but I learned them later in life.   I noticed that the multiplication tables of 9 had a strange point where everything reversed. 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54 63, 72 81. That seemed like a gift that made it easier to memorize them!

Modulo 9 is a mathematical term, meaning ‘divide a number by 9 and use the remainder if there is one.  It’s used to test whether a number is divisible evenly by any number, and I’m using ‘modulo 9’ in this case, because 9 is the number I’m testing. I could ‘test’ modulo 5, or ‘mod 5’ or I could test ‘mod  6’ if 5 or 6 were the number I wanted to test for divisibility.

 

 

14 15 xx xx xx  5  6  XX  65  3X       5 6 XX     65  3X        5  6     65  1      651 backwards and forwards, up and down, coded on the

82 14 xx xx xx  1 5  XX XX  X1      1 5  XX     XX  51         1  5         51     left side, literal on the right side.

x4 2x xx xx xx   X6  XX XX  X5      X6  XX    XX  75           6            75

xx xx xx xx xx   XX XX XX  X6      XX XX     XX  X6                          6

xx xx xx xx xx

 

Notice 5,6,1   in several forms in the first five lines, after transforming according to the rules  of modulo 9.

 

The first block again:  

3.

 

1415926535 8…     

8214808651                

4428810975

7245870066               

3305727036               

9833673362

0005681271               

4201995611

5024459455                                                       

5982534904                

 

The 'decoding' was automatic, I didn't look for it.  I recognized in the left hand corner a pattern of familiar numbers, 561 and it repeated in the right hand corner! And the numbers mirrored 561 651, 156 in all permutations in the left corner. The right hand corner was differently arranged, but I saw the same numbers 653 that I had just noticed were mirrored  in the first line, after the first 6 decimals were 'decoded'.  The number 651 is at the end of the second row, it's formed in the last numbers of the second, third and fourth column. (I noticed 751 also, 157, 751 inside the 651, but at that point 751 meant nothing to me. I've belonged to a union, IAM 751 since 1985, but this fact did not become prominent until about 2 years later. The Chudnovsky episode.

.

3.                                                                                                                               

14    15  xx  65  3x       x5 x6 xx  65 3x        Counting by '3's a 3 is the same as 1.  The number 651 has a long string of events behind it, beginning

82  14  xx  x6  51       x1 x5 xx  x6 51        with a red Datsun 210 station wagon that I acquired in 1984 that was tabbed ETW 651 when I bought

      x4  2x  xx  xx  75        xx  6x xx xx 75        it. It was not a vanity plate but my mind formed Extra Terrestrial Woman 651 at the first glance of the tab.

      xx  xx  xx  xx  x6         xx xx xx  xx  x6        That kind of 'instantaneous' decoding of ETW had never happened to me except in familiar letters, FYI,

      xx  xx  xx   xx  xx        xx xx xx  xx xx          BYOB, etc.

      xx  xx  xx   xx  xx        xx xx xx  xx xx

      xx  xx  xx  xx   xx        xx xx xx  xx xx 

                                                                     

1415926535 8…        14xxxxxxxx         1 4              The numbers form mirrored pairs up and down: 1/4, 1/2 ,1/8

8214808651               82148xxxxx         8 2   14       1/2 up, down, across, backwards and forward, everywhere. .

4428810975               44288xxxxx                 28        44 x 2 = 88   How odd?

7245870066               xxxxxxxxxx

3305727036               xxxxxxxxxx

9833673362               xxxxxxxxxx

0005681271               xxxxxxxxxx

4201995611               xxxxxxxxxx

5024459455               xxxxxxxxxx

5982534904               xxxxxxxxxx

 

                                             

 

There are several names for the same process that I became aware of  privately when I was about 9 years old.  I noticed that the multiplication tables of 9 had a strange point where everything reversed.

 

 

Modulo 9 is a mathematical term, meaning ‘divide a number by 9 and consider the remainder. It’s used to test whether a number is divisible evenly by any number, and I’m using ‘modulo 9’ in this case, because 9 is the number I’m testing. I could ‘test’ modulo 5, or ‘mod 5’ or I could test ‘mod  6’ if 5 or 6 were the number I wanted to test for divisibility.

 

14 15 xx xx xx  5  6  XX  65  3X       5 6 XX   65 3X

82 14 xx xx xx  1 5  XX X6   51      1 5  XX  X6  51

x4 2x xx xx xx   X6  XX XX  X5      X6  XX  XX 75

xx xx xx xx xx   XX XX XX  X6      XX XX  XX  X6

xx xx xx xx xx

 

Notice 5,6,1   in several forms in the first five lines, after transforming according to the rules  of modulo 9. The associations with 751 came about later.

See below:

The Beginning of Pi (The first 1000 digits) This again is the first 1000 digits, arranged in a font that allows 140 decimals on each row, 14 boxes/columns.

The arrangement of 100 decimals in each row  is the arrangement I first saw at the back of Peter Beckmann's History of Pi in which two pages contain the first 10,000 decimals of 100,265 decimals calculated in July 1962.  

  Below are examples of different arrangements that can be made of the first 1,000 decimals of pi. But only one arrangement brings certain numbers into precise neighborhoods in that rectangle. If they were arranged in any other form, they would not have 'danced about' into a form that I recognized, that made relationships that were significant to me in 1989.

The Beginning of Pi (Your basic first 1000 digits) In this arrangement copied from Greg's'  Page of Pi site,  from which I took the first rectangle. It's the  same one Petr Beckman used in The History of Pi in which the first 1000 digits are arranged in  10 columns, marked with a space between each 10 decimals, thus each line contains 100 decimals. The same numbers in these arrangements scatters the same  numbers.

3.
1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989. . .

3.
1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989. . .

This arrangement is an unbroken string  of digits. The next 3 arrangements have a space between each 10 decimals, but in different fonts. I've seen different arrangements, in groups of 3 decimals, in groups of 5 decimals. Different arrangements would never have  created what I saw in the particular arrangement that Petr Beckman chose.

Take the time to examine the way a space between each 10 decimals marks off rectangular columns in the arrangement Petr Beckmann used in his History of Pi.

3.
1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679 8214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196 4428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273 7245870066063155881748815209209628292540917153643678925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094 3305727036575959195309218611738193261179310511854807446237996274956735188575272489122793818301194912 9833673362440656643086021394946395224737190702179860943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132 0005681271452635608277857713427577896091736371787214684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235 4201995611212902196086403441815981362977477130996051870721134999999837297804995105973173281609631859 5024459455346908302642522308253344685035261931188171010003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303 5982534904287554687311595628638823537875937519577818577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201...

 

Here is the expansion of  decimalspi arranged in groups of 50 digits
3.
   14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510
  58209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679
  82148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128
  48111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196
  44288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091
  45648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273
  72458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436
  78925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094
  33057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548
  07446237996274956735188575272489122793818301194912
  98336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798
  60943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132
  00056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872
  14684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235
  42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960
  51870721134999999837297804995105973173281609631859
  50244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881
  71010003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303
  59825349042875546873115956286388235378759375195778
  18577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201989

This is the same 1000 digits, in a smaller font, courier to make it easier to read. There are 15 columns now, thus 150 decimals are on each line.

3.
1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128

4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273

7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548

0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132

0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960

5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303

5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989. . .